迪士尼September 17, 2005 3:36 pm
Title: 迪士尼 | fairy tales rewriting
Produkt: Crosswork
Participate: Flying Bricks
Media：Moleskine 240sq. x greaseproof paper
Art & Illo: Right at Stairz
童話萬神殿的變奏
更具現實意義的童話改寫
15 Comments »
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://flyingbricks.blogsome.com/2005/09/17/coffee-brick-02-2-2/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Coffee Brick 題目
咁快ke, 又話未諗到, 我鍾意杏色label, 同封面!
Comment by flyingbricks — September 17, 2005 @ 9:00 pm
我見到buibui既中秋都跑出啦, 米死都咇左果disney出來先囉。你鍾意杏色label同封面呀? 我鐘意果格仔地啦甘, 哈哈哈, 多謝捧場呀下
Comment by Right — September 17, 2005 @ 9:07 pm
right,你真懂說笑 XD
Comment by flyingbricks — September 17, 2005 @ 11:26 pm
車~ :p
Comment by Right — September 18, 2005 @ 12:42 am
我都好鍾意呀﹗尤其是愛麗詩夢遊仙境
Comment by 月總是藍 — September 19, 2005 @ 2:26 am
阿月好耐冇見, 幾時再同我地一齊玩呀?
Comment by Right — September 19, 2005 @ 8:55 pm
點解要遮住塊面wor … 因為佢係alice?? ^^
Comment by ana — September 19, 2005 @ 11:07 pm
hmmm…maybe因為佢want to be Alice I guees? 人人都想做公主, Disney 呢個wonderland就係一個可以俾fantasy你既地方
Comment by sinfairy — September 19, 2005 @ 11:58 pm
邊果佢? 邊果want to be alice? not me, 其實我覺得alice in wonderland這故事太長氣了。
Comment by Right — September 20, 2005 @ 12:27 am
haahhahaha原來係因為哩個故事悶親right …
Comment by flyingbricks — September 20, 2005 @ 1:50 am
haah, 我睇完你個work之後get到的, 無話邊個想做, 係話in general 我估有好多女仔都有fantasy想做女主角/公主, 所以就用個magazine cover去表達呢樣野？ haha, 可能你唔係咁既意思的
Comment by sinfairy — September 20, 2005 @ 1:51 am
其實我真係冇諗甘多野喎。好多時都係你地討論起我才會想到「呀, 原來可以有甘既意思」..都幾得意架喎
Comment by Right — September 20, 2005 @ 1:56 am
畫者無心，睇者有意
我呀, 寫個黃志光都係求其寫, 點知會有人問我點解係黃志光咯, hahahahaha
Comment by sinfairy — September 20, 2005 @ 9:37 pm
哈哈哈, 笑死我啦…
Comment by Right — September 20, 2005 @ 9:45 pm
super nice drawing and collage!!!
but i dunno if u like disney version of Alice or not. I think, Disney have no claim on Alice and Winnie-thePooh, ‘cos the original is TOO GOOD
Comment by Dead Cat — November 12, 2005 @ 11:48 am